|
An
Article from the Division of Building Research, Washington
DC
T. Ritchie
According
to a dictionary definition efflorescence is a crystalline
deposit on the face of a stone wall or other concrete structures.
Unfortunately, it is not restricted to concrete (curbing),
stone masonry, and concrete flatwork. Notably bricks must
be included. It is a common problem in many areas of the United
States, as it is in many other countries. The immediate problem
raised by its occurrence is that of disfigurement of masonry,
stone and cement walkways and concrete borders. Severe defacement
of a wall is not uncommon. There is, in addition, the possibility
of actual damage to all masonry from the growth of salt crystals
near its surface.
Efflorescence
before cleaning
|
Efflorescence
after cleaning
|
Efflorescence
usually forms shortly after the construction process, with
the result that a brand-new red brick building or concrete
wall may become heavily splotched with a white powder, to
the dismay of the owner and those associated with its construction.
The problem
is not a new one. In an extensive descriptive bibliography
prepared in 1925 over 230 references to it are listed for
the period between 1877 and 1924. One of the articles traces
back the history of the problem at least to the time of the
third Napoleon.
Chemical
Nature of Efflorescence
Many
kinds of salts have been detected in samples of efflorescence.
For example, substances named in the following list were said
to have been found in efflorescences:
| sodium sulfate |
potassium sulfate |
|
| sodium carbonate |
calcium sulfate |
| sodium bicarbonate |
calcium carbonate |
| sodium silicate |
magnesium sulfate |
In addition,
other salts such as chlorides and nitrates, and salts of vanadium,
chromium and molybdenum were mentioned without giving their
specific composition. These last, particularly vanadium, were
said to produce green efflorescence on white or buff burned
clay units, while the other salts produced white or grey deposits
and are not uncommon in the Southwestern part of the United
States.
For several
years, as a part of studies of the Division of Building Research,
samples of efflorescence have been taken from buildings and
analyzed chemically. Many different types of bricks had been
used. In all cases except one, the sample of efflorescence
was obtained from the brick surface; in the exception, the
bricks of the wall were unmarked by efflorescence, but the
mortar joints had heavy salt deposits which projected ¼
to ½ inch from the surface. In all except the mortar
joint efflorescence, chemical analysis of the sample indicated
that a very large proportion of it was sodium sulfate and
potassium sulfate For the mortar joint efflorescence, however,
sodium carbonate was indicated to be the main constituent.
The samples contained small amounts or traces of other materials
as well. The mortar joint being the conduit to efflorescence.
In one
sample from the wall of a building in which very high humidity
is maintained throughout the winter and unusual efflorescence
patterns form beneath windows, it was indicated that magnesium
sulfate was present in considerable amounts, in addition to
sodium and potassium sulfate In other samples calcium was
present in some quantity as carbonate or sulfate Chloride
was either not detected in the samples or was present only
in very small quantity. The "common denominator" of all the
samples analyzed was some salt of sodium and potassium.
The results
of these analyses confirm a previous study of masonry efflorescence
made by R. K. Robertson who noted that "... in all cases of
serious efflorescence, sodium sulfate was invariably present,
rarely being under 50% of the total content", an observation
based on analysis of a great many samples taken over many
years. It was reported also that other salts generally found
in efflorescence are sodium carbonate, magnesium sulfate,
calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate and sometimes slight traces
of sodium chloride.
Weather
and Efflorescence
It has
been observed that efflorescence is usually a seasonal problem.
The cool days and nights of the fall season seem to bring
out salts which have not been seen on the surface in the summer.
The intensity of efflorescence usually increases throughout
the winter season and starts to decrease only in the spring.
By summer the salt deposits have generally entirely disappeared.
In many cases the amount of efflorescence on brick walls and
concrete structures decreases from year to year, so that a
building badly affected in the first winter after construction
may be much less marked in the second, less still in the third,
and entirely unaffected in the following winter.
To account
for the "cold weather" development of efflorescence, there
is a possibility that the rate of evaporation of moisture
from concrete varies from season to season. Under summer conditions
the rate may be very high, so that moisture is evaporated
within the concrete and the soluble salts are deposited within
the concrete rather than on the surface. In colder weather,
however, the evaporation rate may be quite slow; this allows
moisture to move to the outer surface of the structure before
evaporating and leave the salt deposits on the surface.
Sources
of Efflorescence
The movement
of ground water into building foundations and its passage
upwards into masonry by "wicking" action is sometimes the
cause of efflorescence when soil moisture carries with it
soluble salts which later are deposited on the concrete surface.
Efflorescence
frequently forms on brickwork adjoining concrete units. A
good example of this is its occurrence beneath concrete window
sills. In such a situation concrete frequently is wetted from
rain and snow melting on it, and soluble salts of the concrete
are dissolved and may be carried into the brickwork beneath.
Initially,
the work may be free of salts, but later become contaminated
from salts in the adjoining soils. Prolonged dampness also
promotes efflorescence. Thus masonry or other concrete structures
near defective drains are often marked by efflorescence while
other parts of the structures are unaffected; and structures
which are splashed with water from nearby horizontal surfaces
may be similarly marked.
Treatment
of Efflorescence
The usual
method of removing efflorescence from brick walls or concrete
structures is either to dissolve the salts by rinsing with
water, at the same time scrubbing with a brush, or similarly
to dissolve them in a dilute hydrochloric acid solution and
follow by rinsing the solution from the wall. A 50/50 solution
of house vinegar and water will work well in most cases. In
both cases it is probable that some of the salts will be carried
back into the masonry when the wall is wetted and subsequently
again form efflorescence. The acid treatment, however, appears
to be successful in a high proportion of the occasions it
is used. A second session may be necessary in some cases.
When
efflorescence is associated with abnormal wetting of the wall,
as from faulty drains or adjacent water tables, it is of course
necessary to correct these faults before attempting to remove
the efflorescence. When the problem is due to the rise of
ground water it is very difficult to correct, since some form
of horizontal damp-proof course must be inserted in the base
of the wall to prevent continued rise of moisture.
Precautions
Against Efflorescence
Since
so many factors may contribute to the development of efflorescence
on masonry, no one precautionary measure can be expected to
take care of all eventualities.
The over-all
design to ensure that the concrete structures are kept as
dry as possible in service, such as by the use of a roof of
considerable overhang and the avoidance of horizontal surfaces
adjacent to masonry, unless adequately shielded from splashing
and water flow into it, are features that offer protection
against efflorescence. If water drains are placed against
masonry they should be of ample capacity, and they should
be maintained in serviceable condition. In short, the design
of a building with respect to obtaining the maximum degree
of durability of concrete masonry by protecting it from excessive
dampness will also be favorable to the avoidance of efflorescence.
Use
of Water-Repellents to Suppress Efflorescence
In recent
years there has been developed a new class of materials called
silicones, which have come into use in the building field
mainly in connection with attempts to correct problems of
penetration of rain into unit masonry. Some manufacturers
also advocate their use for the prevention of efflorescence
on masonry walls.
When
a brick or some other type of cementeous unit is treated with
silicone, its surface usually becomes highly water-repellent.
Formation of efflorescence on that surface is then usually
suppressed because solutions of salts in the brickwork are
prevented from moving to the surface to evaporate as would
normally be the case. The moisture evaporates beneath the
treated surface, however, and salt deposits accumulate there
rather than on the surface. Localized accumulation of salts
and their crystallization may cause the surface of the structure
to be spalled or flaked off, so that the use of a silicone
treatment to suppress efflorescence may be dangerous in some
cases. (In cases where steel is present inside of the cement
structure.)
Summary
The problem
of efflorescence on concrete masonry is an old one which has
been studied for a great many years. Several factors may influence
the occurrence of efflorescence in a particular case, but
there must be salts in the soil to be taken into solution
by water and then wicks to the surface as the moisture dries.
The movement of the solutions within concrete masonry is controlled
to some considerable extent by seasonal weather, and efflorescence
is usually a "cold weather" problem. Possible sources of the
salts of efflorescence have been described; as well as "outside"
contaminants such as ground water.
Originally published February 1960.
|